Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Seoul Administrative Court 201Guhap30984 (24 August 2012)
Case Number of the previous trial
Seocho 201JL 1122 (OO 22, 2011)
Title
In light of the details of the agreement and the case agreement, it is deemed that cash has been received in accordance with the agreement.
Summary
Since the stamp image affixed to the agreement appears to be the same as the stamp image on other agreements and the certificate of personal seal impression, the agreement appears to be a document prepared by the deceased, and then the case between the deceased and the association is terminated by the agreement, etc., the deceased appears to have received cash in accordance with the agreement, so the original disposition is justifiable.
Cases
2012Nu29044 Global income and revocation of disposition
Plaintiff and appellant
NewA
Defendant, Appellant
Gangwon-gu Director of the District Office
Judgment of the first instance court
Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2011Guhap30984 decided August 24, 2012
Conclusion of Pleadings
April 18, 2013
Imposition of Judgment
May 9, 2013
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked. The part of the Defendant’s imposition disposition of global income tax of KRW 000,000 against the Plaintiff on August 2, 2010, which exceeds KRW 000,000, shall be revoked.
Reasons
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The reasons for the judgment of this court are as follows: " alone the descriptions of evidence A 2 through 6" are as follows: " alone the descriptions of evidence A 2 through 6, and evidence A 7 1 through 3"; and "the between the plaintiff and the deceased" is as follows: "the combination of this case (referred to as west)" and "the deceased" in Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act are as follows.
2. Conclusion
The judgment of the first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed due to lack of grounds.