Plaintiff church (Law Firm Il, Attorneys Park Tae-ok et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Defendant

December 17, 2008

Seoul Eastern District Court Decision 2007Gadan63998 Decided July 4, 2008

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

1. Purport of claim

With respect to the decision protocol in lieu of conciliation of the case between the plaintiff and the defendant in Seoul Eastern District Court 2005da6986 (principal lawsuit), 2006Gadan2750 (Counterclaim), the junior administrative officer of this court grants the execution clause to the plaintiff for compulsory execution against the defendant.

2. Purport of claim

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

The reasoning for the court’s explanation on the instant case is that the Defendant’s “Defendant” in Section 4, Section 11 of the judgment of the court of first instance is cited as “Plaintiff,” and it is identical to the entry of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the replacement of “the annexed drawings” in the new annexed drawings. As such, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Park Young-chul (Presiding Judge) and Kim Ho-sung