logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.08.24 2018고단2059
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Seized evidence 1 to 35 shall be confiscated.

The defendant is a petitioner D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant: (a) opened a call center in the Republic of Korea and China; (b) opened a call center on the victim’s account as if the victim’s account was exposed to a crime; and (c) opened a deposit, etc. in the victim’s account as if the victim’s account was exposed to the crime, the Defendant accessed the victim as if the victim was an employee of the public institution; and (d) received money from the victim and conspired to receive fees.

The Defendant conspireds with a person who was not the deceased, and the person who was the deceased’s name is the Seoul Central Prosecutor around 13:05 on May 28, 2018, and the fact is not the Seoul Central Prosecutor’s Office, but the victim J’s account was used for a crime and the accusation against the victim was received. However, the Defendant is the victim’s phone call “The Seoul Central Prosecutor’s Office.”

A complaint was received due to the use of the passbook in the name of the victim for the crime.

In order to investigate the case, the Bank shall return money to the employee of the Bank after the termination of the deposit with the financial authority.

“A false statement” was made.

Around May 28, 2018, the Defendant was a staff member of the Financial Supervisory Service, who sent a person who was unable to perform his/her name in front of the exit 21 o-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, about May 28, 2018, and received KRW 6,000,000 from the injured.

From May 24, 2018 to June 8, 2018, the Defendant: (a) conspired with the victims of name in collusion, and (b) received a total of KRW 283,591,600 from the victims over 21 times in total, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Form.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to J, L, D, M, N,O, K, P, Q, R, G, T, U,V, F, and I;

1. E’s authentic statement and H’s statement;

1. Each investigation report (No. 3, 4, 9, 19, 32, 46, 57, 58, 78) and each internal investigation report (No. 3,4,9, 19, 32, 46, 57, 58

arrow