The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The court below found the defendant guilty in spite of the absence of the fact that the fingers of the judgment in question face with the victim, which affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts.

2. The court below duly adopted and examined the following circumstances, i.e., ① while waiting for a taxi at the entrance of the D market at the investigative agency and the court of the court below, the victim saw the left hand part of the handball and the blue blusium, etc., on the wind, when waiting for a taxi at the entrance of the D market at the investigation agency and the court of the court below, the victim saw a pain, and blusium on the left hand part and the blusium, etc., on the wind, and blusium blusium, and blusium blusium blusium blusium blusium blusium blusium blusium blusium blusium blusium blusium blusium blusium, and the victim brusium blusium flusium blusium blusium bal.

Mascening farcing

(4) In light of road conditions, unlike the defendant's assertion, it is not physically impossible to excavate the victim to the place where the victim was in his/her possession at the place where the above fingers were in the original place.

In light of the fact that the victim's injury appears to be caused by the defendant's negligence, it is reasonable to view that the victim's injury was caused by another cause.