1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Land Survey Board for Gyeonggi-gun Y Co., Ltd., prepared during the Japanese Occupation Period, is written respectively by E (E; hereinafter “E”) as the assessment title of the FY 2,400 square meters (hereinafter “1 land before division”) and G 607 square meters (hereinafter “B before division”) respectively.

B. The land No. 1 before subdivision was divided into the Z field No. 1,078, AA field No. 250, AB level No. 1,072 level. On December 29, 1961, the land No. 1 was further subdivided into 318, AC level No. 51, and AD level No. 758 level prior to the Gyeonggi-gun Group AB, and the land No. 318 level prior to AB level following administrative change and unit conversion was the land set forth in attached Table No. 1, and the land set forth in attached Table No. 2 was the land set forth in attached Table No. 2.

C. The land No. 2 before subdivision was divided into 162 square meters in G, 162 square meters in Gyeonggi-gun and 445 square meters in AE river, and the said “former G 162 square meters” was divided into five hundred and sixty-five square meters in Priju-si, and the said “AE river 445 square meters” was the land indicated in attached Table 4, and the said “V preceding 536 square meters” was divided into each land listed in attached Tables 3 and 5, on October 28, 199.

On October 13, 1995, with respect to each land listed in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Schedule Nos. 1, 1995, with respect to the land listed in Schedule No. 4 on May 4, 1996, the Defendant made each registration of preservation of ownership on each land listed in Schedule No. 3 and 5 of Schedule No. 3 and 4 on May 24, 2004.

E. The Plaintiffs are the successors to H, who are the successors to Australia, who were the successors to Australia, who resided in the Gyeonggi-gu Y.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap's 1 through 8, Eul's 1 through 3, and 5 (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. E, the father of the decedent AE, who claimed by the plaintiffs, acquired the ownership of the land Nos. 1 and 2 before the division. The plaintiffs acquired the ownership by inheritance of each land listed in the separate sheet through E (hereinafter “instant land”). The defendant has any title to the land.