logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.02.13 2013가단161380
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On July 10, 1913, the forest survey report on the Gyeonggi-gun L, which was prepared by the Japanese governor-general during the Japanese occupation period, states that M was given the status of each real estate listed in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the attached Table No. 1 (hereinafter “instant land”) on July 10, 1913, and the land survey report on the Gyeonggi-gun N (the name of the administrative district was changed to Gyeonggi-gunO) was written by P on October 10, 1913 (the name of the administrative district was changed to the Gyeonggi-gunO), and the land survey report was written by P on October 10, 1913 (the last two years).

B. (i) Division process of each land listed in the separate sheet Nos. 3 through 6 was divided into 93 square meters prior to R on July 6, 1994, and 223 square meters prior to C. 223 square meters prior to T. 223 square meters became the land listed in the separate sheet No. 6 (hereinafter “instant 6 land”). The 93 square meters prior to R was 307 square meters through a change of land category and a conversion into a unit of area on the same day, and the 1,072 square meters prior to S was 3,544 square meters prior to S through a conversion into a unit of area on the same day.

After that, on December 15, 1994, the land indicated in paragraph (4) of the attached Table (hereinafter “instant four land”), U, 1,686 square meters, and 1,170 square meters prior to V was re-divided.

B. The administrative district was changed on November 28, 200, and U 1,686 square meters was the land indicated in attached Table 5 (hereinafter “instant 5 land”). The R/W 307 square meters was the 307 square meters in Gyeonggi-gun, Gyeonggi-do, and the 1,170 square meters in total was the 1,170 square meters in total before the V of Gyeonggi-do.

Article 22(1) of the Civil Act provides that “The term “the term “the term “the term “the term “the term” means “the term “the term “the term” means “the term “the term” as “the term “the term “the term” as “the term “the term “which” means the term “the term” as “the term “the term” under Article 2(1) of the Civil Act.

C. On February 5, 1965 with respect to the instant land 1, 2, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of Y, Defendant G, H, I, and J on February 5, 1965, and on March 2, 2012, Defendant K as to the entire shares of Y.

arrow