1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On July 30, 1987, the plaintiff's assertion that the defendant made a statement that C shall pay 1,000,000 won each month to C who was the defendant's director within the limit of 150,000,000 won on the condition that C shall be liable for a tax investigation, and the plaintiff acquired the claim under the above statement from C.

In addition, on December 21, 1995, the Defendant agreed to pay KRW 35,00,000 after December 20, 2005 to the holders of the payment note (Evidence A3, hereinafter “the instant payment note”), and the Plaintiff holds the said payment note.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the total amount of 185,000,000 won and damages for delay.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the descriptions and shapes of Gap evidence Nos. 2-1, 7, and Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5-1, 2, 6-1, 2, 3, and 4-1, 6-1, 6-2, 3, and 4 as to the claim for the amount of money transferred, the stamp image of the defendant corporation and the minutes of the board of directors of the defendant corporation are as follows.

① 피고 법인 인영 -1985. 1. 21. 이사회 회의록 통보 -1986. 4. 19. 임시 이사회 소집 통보 -1987. 7. 30. 이 사건 각서 -1996. 8. 16. 인감등록부 ② D의 인영 -1986. 12. 12. 회의록 -1987. 1. 12. 회의록 -1987. 7. 30. 이 사건 각서 -1988. 5. 12. 의사록 -1988. 6. 28. 의사록 -1989. 4. 13. 회의록 -1996. 5. 21. 회의록 우선 각 피고 법인 인영을 살펴보면, 이 사건 각서에 날인한 것과 다른 서류에 날인한 것의 서체가 다르고, 이 사건 각서에 날인한 것에는 ‘●’ 모양이 있지만 이와 달리 다른 서류에 날인한 것에는 ‘★’ 모양이 있다.

Then, examining the seals of D, only the seals affixed to the notes of this case are different from those affixed by Defendant D to the meeting minutes of the board of directors.

In this regard, Gap evidence 4, Eul evidence 3-1, 2, 3, 4-1, 2, 7, and 13-1, respectively.