logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.08.09 2017고단8
업무상배임등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, such as public electronic records, is the actual owner of F, one of the shareholders of E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”) located in the Gu, U.S. D shop 1, and G is the shareholder interest representative director of the said company, and H was the auditor of the said company.

E According to the E’s articles of incorporation, the representative director shall convene a general meeting of shareholders, but shall notify the shareholders of the date, time, place, and purpose of the meeting in writing at least one week prior to the general meeting, and the board of directors shall convene a meeting separately from the representative director or the directors determined by the board of directors, but shall notify each director and the auditor of the

Nevertheless, on September 15, 2015, the Defendant, who is not authorized to convene a general meeting of shareholders, prepared the minutes of a general meeting of shareholders and the minutes of the board of directors with a false statement that he/she held a general meeting of shareholders without the convocation decision of the board of directors or the convocation procedure for shareholders in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I Building 203, and that he/she dismissed G and J as the joint representative director and appointed H as the representative director under the attendance of

On September 17, 2015, the Defendant submitted the minutes of a temporary general meeting of shareholders and the minutes of the board of directors in charge of the public official in charge of the registry office of the Daegu District Court, Daegu District Court, Daegu District Court, 5-8, 10-8, in the form of the Gu-U.S.-si, Daegu District Court, as of September 17, 2015, and filed an application for registration of change of the representative director, and the said

Computerized input was made.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false report to a public official to record false facts in the corporate register of the same electronic records as the original copy of the fair deed.

2. On September 17, 2015, the Defendant had the Daegu District Court registry office keep and exercise the corporate registry that recorded false facts, as described in paragraph 1, at around September 17, 2015.

3. The defendant in occupational breach of trust shall be the victim E.

arrow