The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (five months in prison) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. It is true that there is a favorable condition for sentencing to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant caused a traffic accident that causes a shocking of the victim on a crosswalk in contravention of the signal and resulting in serious injury to the victim for about 12 weeks; (b) the quality of the crime is bad; (c) the Defendant did not agree with the victim until the Defendant was in the trial; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., which are conditions for sentencing as indicated in the instant case, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant and his defense counsel's above assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.