The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that of the lower court’s punishment (six months’ imprisonment without prison labor) is too unreasonable.

2. It is true that there are conditions for sentencing favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognizes the crime of this case and has no record of criminal punishment.

However, the defendant has been driving a motor vehicle by neglecting his duty of care.

In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the occurrence of a traffic accident shocking the victim; (b) the victim suffered serious injury that requires medical treatment for about 14 weeks; and (c) the victim suffered bad quality; (d) the Defendant did not agree with the victim until the trial was in trial; and (e) the Defendant did not recover from damage; and (e) other circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, etc., which are conditions for sentencing specified in the instant case, are considered to be too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant and his defense counsel's above assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.