logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2021.02.17 2020나10717
구상금
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

The purport and purport of the appeal

1. The purport of the claim;

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid agreement with respect to a motor vehicle C (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid agreement with respect to the motor vehicle D (hereinafter “Defendant”).

B. On March 29, 2019, the driver of the Defendant vehicle driven the Defendant vehicle at around 09:00, while driving the four-lanes of the four-lane road in front of the Shii-si Eth of the Shii-si, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-si, the driver stopped and sent a signal on the four-lane above the intersection in order to direct the fire station in the vicinity of the Shii-si bus terminal located in the front of the intersection. The four-lanes in front of the intersection were wider than the ordinary lane, but the two-lanes were clearly wider than the ordinary lane, and the straight line was prohibited.

(c)

In this regard, the driver of the plaintiff vehicle driven the plaintiff vehicle along the four-lanes along the above four-lanes of the road, going through the right side of the defendant vehicle, which stopped on the left side of the four-lanes of the above four-lanes of the road, and moves to the right side of the Dong-dong post office, while trying to turn back the vehicle in the future of the defendant vehicle in order to avoid another vehicle on the right side and to make a treatment turn back, and there was an accident that conflicts between the right side of the defendant vehicle and the left side of the plaintiff vehicle (hereinafter “the accident in this case”).

(d)

Due to the instant accident, F, who was the passenger of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, was injured, and the Plaintiff paid KRW 860,930 to the medical expenses and the amount agreed by June 7, 2019.

[Ground of recognition] Gap evidence of Nos. 1 through 8, Eul evidence of Nos. 1 through 4, video (including those with numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Summary of the parties’ assertion

A. The Defendant vehicle, waiting for the straight-line signal at the fourth line that can only be argued by the Plaintiff, waiting for the straight-line signal, is running down to the straight-line signal, and is moving down by the right-way.

arrow