logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.05.26 2019나64572
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) with respect to C Vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is the insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to D Vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant”).

B. At around 12:22 March 2, 2019, the Defendant and the Plaintiff vehicles waiting for the front of the 2,3-lanes front of the 2,3-lanes, respectively, on the five-lanes of the shooting distance (the direction to go from the Gu’s station to the sexual waters) in the Seoyang-dong, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

C. The road before entering the intersection where the plaintiff vehicle and the defendant vehicle waiting for the signal is waiting for the signal is the left-hand exclusive road on the two-lanes, and the two-lanes are the straight and left-hand lanes, and the three-lanes are the straight and right-hand lanes, and the five-lanes were designated as the right-hand exclusive road.

Since the two lanes prior to the entry into the intersection pass along the intersection, the two lanes prior to the entry into the intersection, the three lanes prior to the entry into the intersection, and the three lanes prior to the entry into the intersection pass along the intersection, and the two lanes equal to the two lanes in the width.

The intersection did not indicate the two straight lanes. D.

As the Plaintiff’s vehicle started to the left side in accordance with the straight line and the Defendant’s vehicle entered the intersection from the right side to the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle, there was an accident where the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle and the left side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle are faced.

(hereinafter “instant accident”) e.

Due to the instant accident, KRW 500,000 was paid as the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and the Plaintiff paid KRW 300,000,000 insurance money calculated by subtracting KRW 200,000 from the Plaintiff E on March 26, 2019 according to the instant insurance contract.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 5, 8, 9, each entry of Gap 1, 5, 8, 9, Gap 2 through 4, 7, Eul 2 and 3, and arguments.

arrow