logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.07.13 2018고정310
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and B are between them, and the victim C is a drinking house of "E" with D1 floor in Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si.

Defendant and B, around 01:00 on May 19, 2016, had a voice of having a strong voice of drinking and drinking throughout the drinking house D 1st floor “E” at Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si.

F(36 s., South) made a dispute by making an answer to the Defendant’s table and “slicking” on the Defendant’s table.

1. On May 19, 2016, around 01:00, the Defendant and B collected 617,180 won at the bottom of the total market price, including 2,2,7,060 won per 32,00 won per 32,00 won per 32,50 won per 1,00 won per 617,180 won per 1,00 won per unit in front of the dispute with F (36, South) and 2,360 won.

2. The Defendant interfering with the business, and B interfered with the victim’s business by force by force, even though the victim’s dispute with F still remains satisfy in the above circumstances, making approximately one hour continuous noise and fighting with his body, causing other customers to throw away from the place without calculating it.

As a result, the defendant and B jointly damaged the victim's property and interfered with the victim's business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement by the police in relation to C and G;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 314(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, Articles 366 and 30 of the Criminal Act, Articles 366 and 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act of the order of provisional payment is to partially reduce the amount of fine prescribed in the summary order by taking into account the following factors: (a) the confession and reflection of each of the instant crimes; (b) some of the occurrence of trial expenses between F and F; and (c) the criminal record and relation of the Defendant

arrow