The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the representative who operates an event planning company called “B”.

On May 17, 2018, the Defendant assaulted the victim on three occasions at the left face of the victim due to drinking, on the following grounds: (a) the victim D (32 years of age) who is an employee of the company, was fluent at the entrance of the first floor of the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan City C building; and (b) the victim was fluenced on three occasions due to drinking.

2. We examine the judgment. The case is a case in which the victim cannot institute a public prosecution against the clearly expressed will of the victim. According to the agreement attached to the letter of impeachment dated June 19, 2018, the victim clearly expressed his/her wish not to prosecute the defendant after the institution of the public prosecution of this case. Thus, this part of the public prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.