A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on June 28, 2007 (the issuance of a summary order of KRW 1,500,000,000 at the Sungnam Support of Suwon Friwon, August 24, 2007), driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on December 17, 2009 (the issuance of a summary order of KRW 1,50,000,000,000,000,000 at the Sungnam Support of Suwon Friwon, on January 12, 2010), driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on September 5, 201 (the issuance of a summary order of KRW 1,50,00,00,000,000,000), and violates Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

On August 11, 2018, the Defendant driven a BS-type car under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.065% alcohol concentration from around 200 meters to around 826, as seen above, to a person who violated the Road Traffic Act by driving two or more times of drinking, and from around the road in the ethic City of the ethic City of the ethic City of the ethic City of the ethic City of the ethic City of the ethic City of the ethic City of the ethic City of the ethic City

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reporting on the arrest of a person in violation of traffic laws on roads;

1. Report on the circumstances of a driver who is placed in driving and notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Records of judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, report on investigation (Attachment to the same type of judgment, etc.);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for the crime of this case is that the defendant, who has had a record of driving under drinking not less than twice of alcohol, once again driving under the influence of alcohol, and the nature of the crime is not less than that of the crime;

However, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and divided his mistake, the blood alcohol concentration in the blood due to drinking of this case is not very high, the defendant has no record of being punished for suspended execution or more, and the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and means of the crime.