A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on January 14, 2007 (the issuance of a summary order of KRW 2 million at the Sungnam Support of Suwon Friwon on April 13, 2007), driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on November 20, 2010 (the issuance of a summary order of KRW 2.5 million at the Sungnam Support of Suwon Friwon, on December 14, 2010), driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on June 25, 2014 (the issuance of a summary order of KRW 5 million at the Sungnam Support of Suwon Friwon, on July 9, 2014), and violating Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

On February 28, 2018, the Defendant driven a car with B, under the influence of alcohol of about 1 0.199% from the 1k section to the front road of the ICF oil station located in the Shinsi-dong of the wife population, from the vicinity of the air conditioning station, to the Hensi-dong of the wife population, at about 00:25, the Defendant driven a car with B, while under the influence of alcohol of about 0.19%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reporting on the arrest of a suspect in violation of traffic laws on roads;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. A report on the measurement of drinking alcohol and a report on alcohol appraisal during blood transfusion;

1. Records of judgment: References to inquiries, application of investigation reports (before a drinking driver and attachment of judgment) and statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act was committed by the Defendant, who had had had had had a driving of drinking not less than twice, and the nature of the crime is not less than that of the crime, but more than 0.199% of the blood concentration due to the instant drinking, and the Defendant escaped by avoiding inspection for regulating the driving of drinking.

However, the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and divided his mistake, the defendant has no record of punishment for the suspension of execution or heavier until now, and the defendant has no record of doing so.