beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment of three years and six months, Defendant B's imprisonment of three years, Defendant C's imprisonment of two years, and Defendant D of two years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal record] Defendant A stated in the indictment on March 26, 2010 as December 16, 2009, but appears to be a clerical error.
A person who was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act in the Daejeon District Court on May 12, 201 and completed the execution of the sentence in the Daejeon District Court on May 12, 201, and Defendant B was sentenced to four years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and the Protection of Victims, etc. (special rape) at the Chungcheongnam District Court on November 8, 2007 and completed the execution of the sentence in the Chungcheongnam District Court on August 5, 201.
【Criminal Facts】
Defendant A, B, C, and D agreed to share their respective roles with the intention to attract money and valuables under the pretext of agreement by using many cases of persons whose driver’s license was revoked to visit the Road Traffic Authority in order to receive special traffic safety education, as if they were involved in traffic accidents, and as if they were involved in non-licensed drivers, Defendant A, B, C, and D agreed to share their respective roles with the intention to attract mutual agreement by threatening the victims to report to the police by using the weak points of non-licensed drivers, “water color,” “patients facing the body of the victim’s driving vehicle,” “patients,” “the victim’s driver without the license,” and “the tracking” leading the victims to mutual agreement by threatening them to report to the police.
1. On January 28, 2013, Defendant A, B, and C’s co-principal behavior, Defendant C asked the victim I (the age of 62) who was suffering from special safety education at the Daejeon-dong Branch of the Road Traffic Authority located in Daejeon-gu Daejeon to “whether the license has been revoked” and notify Defendant A of this.
As such, Defendant A and Defendant B waited at the place where the crime is easy by overtaking the victim's vehicle by driving a car on the number unsatisfy, and Defendant C driven a car on the number unsatisfy, thereby informing Defendant A and B of the location of the victim by communicating the car to Defendant A and B.