logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원군산지원 2017.10.10 2016가단58077
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly do so to the Plaintiff A and B, each of which is KRW 1,00,000, and KRW 7,000,000, and each of them.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

Plaintiff

A and B are the parents of Plaintiff C, and the Defendants are the parents of F.

F. From November 18, 2015, the mentally and physically handicapped person whose intelligence index 31 (age 4 years and 4 months) and social well-beingdness level 29 (age 4 years of age) are merely physical and mentally disabled person, who finds that Plaintiff C entered into an apartment through a joint realization, and enters the joint realization according to Plaintiff C, who was walking in the direction of an elevator, followed the stairs of Plaintiff C’s arms, coming from the underground parking lot from the first floor to the underground parking lot, and led the Plaintiff C in two arms, divided Plaintiff C with the body of the Plaintiff C’s body on the top of the body of the Plaintiff C, divided Plaintiff C into the body of the Plaintiff C, sealed Plaintiff C’s sound into the Plaintiff’s hand, and forced Plaintiff C’s 1 to prevent Plaintiff C from committing an indecent act. Plaintiff C’s 1 to the other hand, and Plaintiff C’s 1 to the other hand.

(2) The court below's judgment dismissing the request for medical treatment and custody on the ground that "F is deemed to have committed the instant crime," but the former District Court rendered a judgment dismissing the request for medical treatment and custody on October 27, 2016, on the ground that "F is deemed to have had committed the instant crime, and require medical treatment and management for mental illness, but it appears that the environment of the medical treatment and custody center for a medical doctor who has given a F's mental diagnosis would be excessive to F, and that F's family members would have strong intention to properly treat and protect the F and prevent re-offending," while the prosecutor appealed against this case (Seoul High Court) but the judgment dismissing the request for medical treatment and custody became final and conclusive on January 24, 2017.

Plaintiff

C If the crime of this case occurred after the crime of this case, it is stressed that the situation at the time of the crime of this case remains out and the fear that it will result in bad work.

arrow