Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff as the party concerned is an incorporated association that runs a business, such as the payment of assistance money, etc. to retired members with the aim of promoting the stability of the National Intelligence Service employees’ livelihood and promoting their welfare and contributing to the promotion of national security and national interests, and the Defendant is a company that aims at collective investment business, etc. under the former Act on Business of Operating Indirect Investment and Assets (hereinafter “former Indirect Investment and Assets Act”).
B. On May 21, 2008, the Plaintiff, on May 21, 2008, (i) the structure and investment circumstances of the Fund. (ii) The Plaintiff is a school investment trust management company (hereinafter “school investment trust”).
ii) the “Irman International brand International branded Private Equity Property Investment Trust 1” (hereinafter referred to as the “Irrar Fund”) created and operated by the Party.
1) The KIF invested KRW 4 billion. The KIF shall be Korea Securities Finance Corporation (hereinafter “Korea Securities Finance Corporation”).
trustee company, SPC A corporation (hereinafter referred to as “A”)
business entity and SK Securities Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “SK Securities”).
A) A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “B”) whose business operator is a sales trustee company
) The business of importing sports clothes and other products through the business of selling them to home shopping and Onnuri shopping mall (hereinafter “instant business”).
(2) On January 12, 2009, the Defendant’s employees C, on the following grounds: (a) on January 12, 2009, set up an asset management company as the Defendant, Korea Securities Finance Company as a trustee company; and (b) as a trustee company, K26 of the Special Assets Investment Trust for New Private Equity Capital (hereinafter “the Fund”) as the Plaintiff, an investor, as an investor, was in the structure of distributing profits to the Plaintiff. However, as the Plaintiff did not properly proceed with the instant business, there was an investment loss due to the Plaintiff’s early liquidation of the school fund and received redemption of the remaining appraised assets, and subsequently, changed the asset management company as the Defendant and the Defendant’s employee C intended to invest the assets management company as the investment source.