Defendants are innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant A is the business owner of the FF in the underground building of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Defendant B is the person who worked as the office at the above business establishment, and Defendant C is the employee of the above business establishment.

Defendant

At around 15:15 on May 2, 2013, the Defendants conspired to receive 90,000 won from male customers G, guide G to the three rooms of the above establishment, and let C enter the three rooms of the G, thereby inducing the situation by putting the sexual organ of G into the three rooms, thereby arranging sexual traffic.

B. Defendant C, at the date, time, place, and place indicated in paragraph (1), would receive KRW 40,000 per customer, and, as seen above, Defendant C engaged in sexual traffic by using a single name “Handbling service”, which is a similar teaching act inducing circumstances by putting the sexual organ of G in hand.

2. Defendant A and B, the defense counsel’s defense counsel’s defense counsel’s defense counsel’s defense counsel’s defense counsel’s defense counsel’s defense counsel’s defense counsel did not arrange sexual traffic for business purpose, Defendant C did not have any act of similarity, Defendant C prepared a written statement as the controlling police officer’s defense counsel’s defense counsel’s defense counsel’s defense counsel’s defense counsel’

3. Determination

A. The evidence of criminal facts must be presented by the prosecutor, and the criminal facts must be proven by the judge so high probability that there is no reasonable doubt, and if there is no evidence to establish such a degree of conviction, the defendant is suspected to be guilty.

Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.

B. As shown in the facts charged in the instant case, the written statement prepared by the Defendant C, each police protocol prepared by the Defendant C, the second protocol of trial.