Defendants are not guilty.

1. On November 17, 2012, Co-defendant A (hereinafter “A”) was subject to assault against the victim R from the KO, the co-defendant A (hereinafter “A”) around 01:00 on November 17, 2012, in order to obtain prompt phone call and contact the Defendants with the Defendants as soon as possible.

At around 01:30 on November 17, 2012, the Defendants jointly with A, and around 01:0, at the above place, A called “A”, called “A”, called “A”, franshed the victim’s face one time in drinking, and franshed the victim’s face one time in drinking, Defendant P pushed the victim into a crypt, and Defendant Q put the victim’s face two times in drinking, and Defendant Q puts down the victim’s face next to the above Defendants.

As a result, the defendants jointly with A, caused damage to the victim, such as the hand and the hand that require approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

2. The Defendants asserted that the Defendants, while speaking for the victim R and the victim R and left the scene of T andO, only left the scene and did not have any participation in the above crime.

There are statements in the investigation agency and court of M as evidence consistent with the above facts of the crime, each of the statements in the investigation agency and the R investigation agency.

M made a statement in an investigative agency that there are several persons at the time when A was waiting for the victim, but there are three persons. Since then, in the court, the degree of three persons was not directly used when A and the victim are walked, but the degree of three persons was walked and waled in the situation when A and the victim were waled, and the defendant was waled and waled, and the defendant was the same as that not mentioned in the above fighting, and the person who was wald and wald in large and staled with the above fighting is memoryd.

In addition, the victim was sent to the victim by three persons together with A at the investigative agency, and the victim was 'the defendant.'