1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months of imprisonment at the Daejeon District Court on June 13, 2017 and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 21, 2017.

[2] On September 11, 2016, the Defendants: (a) around 03:35, 2016, on the front way of “F” located in Daejeon Daejeon Daejeon, on the grounds that the victim G (26 years of age) was friendly, and Defendant A’s part of the part of the Defendant A, who was followed by the victim, was frighted to the victim while she was walking, was not neglected; (b) Defendant A took the face of the victim 3 to 4 times as drinking; (c) Defendant A took the face of the victim 10 times as drinking; and (d) Defendant B took the face of the victim five times as drinking by drinking.

As a result, the Defendants, in collaboration with H, committed an injury to the victim in the non-furnal framework that requires approximately four weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. The defendant B's partial statement

1. Each legal statement of a witness G, I and J;

1. Previous conviction (Defendant A): Determination on the assertion of a reply, such as criminal history, Defendant B, and defense counsel

1. The gist of the assertion is that the Defendant only took part in the attack between A, H and the victim, who was his/her own behavior, and did not take part in the assault.

2. Although the Defendant consistently stated in an investigative agency that he did not participate in the assault of friendlys, even though the Defendant stated to the effect that he did not consistently fight until this Court, the victim, including the Defendant, and three persons including A and H, from the investigative agency up to this Court, took his face.

A consistent statement, the defendant J and I are consistent with the victim's statement, and I do not correctly witness the defendant's face in this court, but in addition, when the defendant and two other persons such as the defendant and A are speaking for the victim, they are so long as they are different.