logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2014.06.12 2014고단26
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[B] On January 21, 2005, C leased approximately 100 commercial buildings of the first floor in the D Building at Si/Gu (hereinafter “the main building”) from the Si/Gu Life Insurance Co., Ltd., and the same year as to the main building after leasing it from the Si Life Insurance Co., Ltd.

2.3. Registered Establishment of Chonsegwon

Since then, the defendant used approximately 30 square meters of the above 100 square meters, and C used the remaining 70 square meters to operate a store for each of the women.

C On September 22, 2011, E and “E shall pay C the amount of KRW 170 million as premium, and take over the right to lease on a commercial building (hereinafter “the right to lease on a deposit basis”). E made a contract with “E” (hereinafter “the right to lease on a deposit basis”) and “E shall pay C the total amount of KRW 50 million as down payment and intermediate payment, but C did not know the right to lease on a commercial building until November 5, 201, which is the remaining payment date.

Since then, C filed a lawsuit seeking payment of KRW 120 million for the unpaid premium against E, and E filed a lawsuit seeking the return of down payment and intermediate payment as a counterclaim against C, and the Defendant was present as a witness in the above lawsuit and testified.

【Criminal Facts】

Around 16:50 on July 2, 2012, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath at the Changwon District Court’s jurisdiction over the 67 Changwon District Court in the Haak-ro 2012, the above court’s 2012Gahap651 (main office) and 2012Gahap1968 (Counterclaim).

① The Defendant responded to the question of the Defendant’s agent, “I am to the question of whether the part of the building possessed by the Plaintiff is not directed to the Defendant, but directed the Plaintiff to the Non-Party interested in the State Life Insurance (the owner of the building).”

② The Defendant responded to the question of the Defendant’s agent that “A witness does not know that the Plaintiff would pay premium on the condition that the entire building was transferred to the Defendant.”

However, the facts are as follows: ① The Defendant attempted to guide the commercial building to E.

arrow