logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.07.12 2017누82262
입찰참가자격제한처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

The reasoning for this case is that the court which accepted the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following modifications. Thus, this case is quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Each "this Court" in the 12th, 19th, 20th, and 14th, the revised part of the judgment of the court of first instance, shall be "the court of first instance".

The written judgment of the first instance court shall be the "exploitation" of the 12th page 9 of the written judgment.

Article 14 of the Judgment of the first instance court provides that “Inasmuch as there is no “month” from the last 19th to the last eth, it is insufficient to deem that only a specific enterprise that is exclusively in the exclusive status of each of the goods or parts of this case can manufacture the goods or parts of this case, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.”

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow