logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.11.11 2016나51729
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance other than the following Paragraph (2). Thus, this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance court, the part which is dismissed or added, “Defendant B” shall be respectively dismissed “Co-Defendant B of the first instance trial.”

The fifth 20th 20th 20th 20th 20th 20th 20th 6th 7th 7th 6th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7

After the 6th 10th 10th 10th 1th 6th 2th 6th 6th 10th 6th 6th 2th 2th 200, the Defendant simply appears to be present in the form of a buyer under the instant sales contract.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow