logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2015.08.13 2014가단33942
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. In full view of the facts that there is no dispute between the parties to the basic facts, Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 7 and 12, and the purport of the whole pleadings, Eul's attached list No. 28 of Feb. 28, 1969 (hereinafter "each real estate of this case") completed the registration of ownership transfer as to each real estate listed in the attached list No. 1 of this case (hereinafter "each real estate of this case"), and the defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer as to each real estate of this case on March 24, 1969 on the ground of "Sale on March 10, 1969" (hereinafter "each registration of ownership transfer of this case"), Eul died on April 15, 191 and "the deceased".

The plaintiff can recognize the fact that he is a sole heir of the deceased.

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion - He had purchased each of the instant real estate before completing the registration of ownership transfer under his name, and owned it without completing the registration.

However, in 1969, the defendant received grain from the Government of the United States of America in accordance with 480 U.S. public law, and planned to "a plan to seek public exploitation business and to mobilize residents and to distribute grain to their comments," as a tool to divide it into C community residents.

The Defendant, while coloring the object of the public entertainment business, intended to select the business of reclaiming each of the instant real estate owned by the Plaintiff, which was the French land at the time. For this purpose, each of the instant real estate owned by the local government.

Therefore, if the public official of the defendant at the time transferred the name of the owner of each of the instant real estate to the deceased, the defendant distributed the name of the owner of each of the instant real estate to the village residents who were mobilized for the instant project after being tightly supported by the public exploitation project, and upon the completion of the development project, he would transfer the name of the owner of each of the instant real estate to the deceased again. The deceased decided that the title trust of each of the instant real estate shall be held on February 28, 1969.

arrow