logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.11.17 2016고합221
특수공무집행방해치상등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around September 23, 2016, the Defendant injured by a special obstruction of performance of official duties was drunkly administered to “Dmotour in Kimhae-si, Kim Jong-si,” which was under the influence of alcohol.

Although the Defendant requested the above her mother to do so several times, it was rejected, and the Defendant was asked to refund accommodation expenses to the her mother, so it was difficult to avoid disturbance with the her mother, the her mother, and the her mother and the her mother, who reported the 112 note that the her mother and the her mother reported it to the 112.

In light of the above facts, the police officer (the age of 26) of the Police Station Police Station, called upon the above report, listened to the details of the report from the her mother, and notified that the Defendant may be punished for interference with business if the Defendant continues to be disturbed, the Defendant would be punished by the crime of interference with business. The Defendant was waiting at the time after getting on the FK5 vehicle, which she was traveling to the other her train parking lot, after getting on the fK5 vehicle that she got out of the interested her, and going on the e at the entrance of the parking lot, while getting out of the e, which is a dangerous object by rapid driving of the said vehicle, going to the entrance of the parking lot, and going beyond the ground.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of the 112 Report Report case, and thereby, he suffered the victim E with the right-hand shoulder's compensation that requires approximately six weeks of treatment.

2. Around 00:05 on September 13, 2016, the Defendant driven the said K5-car while under the influence of alcohol content of about 150 meters from the 150 meters section to the front road of the Jin-gu, Jin-gu, Jin-si branch, Jin-si, Gin-si, Gin-si, Gin-si, Gin-si, Gin-si, Gin-si, Gin-si, Gin-si, Gin-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and G;

1. The CD;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written reports and diagnosis reports on drivers;

1. Article 144(2) main sentence and Article 144(1), and Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment;

arrow