Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

When the Defendant was unable to enter a new mobile phone as a bad credit holder, the Defendant subscribed to a mobile phone in the name of her parent B and sentenced him to not pay the fee.

1. On February 26, 2010, the Defendant: (a) made a telephone call to C and applied for the membership of the KT cell phone; and (b) received an application for the use of service with the mobile phone around that time; and (c) received an application for the use of service with the mobile phone around that time.

On February 2, 2010, the Defendant entered “B” in each applicant’s column using the service use application, number transfer application and written confirmation of customer consent, which was delivered in the post office located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government, with the personal information of B, and signed later.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged the application form for the use of mobile phone service in the name of private document B, which is a private document on rights and obligations, one copy of the application form for the change of numbers, and one copy of the customer consent certificate.

2. On February 2010, the Defendant at the above post office filed an application for mobile phone admission to an employee who is not aware of the forgery, and subsequently sent one copy of the forged mobile phone service application, one copy of the number transfer application, and one copy of the customer consent certificate, as if they were duly formed, to reach the time.

3. The defrauded did not have any intent or ability to pay the fee even if he/she uses the mobile phone after filing an application for a mobile phone with KTT Co., Ltd. at the date and place specified in paragraph 2.

Nevertheless, the Defendant applied for the purchase of a mobile phone and used the delivered mobile phone.

Accordingly, the Defendant deceiving the victim company and obtained the pecuniary benefit equivalent to the 437,700 won of the charge using the mobile phone delivery from the victim company around that time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. B.