The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (as to the part on the violation of the Road Traffic Act), the Defendant did not violate the signal at the time of the instant accident.

The judgment of the court below which convicted the Defendant of the facts charged of this case is erroneous.

2. The victim D and witness F, from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, are clearly and consistently speaking from the victim D and witness F, to “D waits for the left-hand turn, waits for the signal to turn to the left, entered the intersection after the signal is changed and left-hand, and at the time, the Defendant was in violation of the signal and her right-hand turn to the left-hand turn, and her vehicle was shocked at the center by lowering the speed while the Defendant was making a straight-down and

In addition to the circumstances at the time, F’s statement made by a witness to an investigative agency, the location where F was waiting for the signal at the time of the instant accident, and the structure and signal system of the intersection of the instant accident, credibility is shown in D and F’s statement.

D and F’s statement to the court below that found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case is just, and there is no error of law that misleads the facts.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.