1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The United States entered into a security service contract with an enterprise selected as qualified through a competitive bid, and subsequently had the relevant enterprise take charge of the initial usfk guard, etc. of each usfk located across the country, such as Yongsan-gu Seoul, Dobcheon-si and Busan (hereinafter referred to as the "Conclusion of a security service contract") (hereinafter referred to as the "usfk") as the parties are for convenience.

2) Accordingly, from September 2006 to November 201, 201, the K4S Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G4S”) (hereinafter “G4S”), which is a security company in the UK.

) Upon entering into a security service contract with the United States Armed Forces in Korea, some workers belonging to the said company refused to provide labor due to the conflict between the labor and management regarding the working conditions of wages, etc. during the performance of security service.

Accordingly, USFK terminated the security service contract with G4S and announced a tender to select a new service company on April 2012.

As a result, the defendant is awarded as a service company, and the same year.

9.7. The Security Service Contract was concluded with the United States Armed Forces in Korea (hereinafter “instant Security Service Contract”).

B. 1) After the conclusion of the instant security service contract, the Defendant applied for security services including the Plaintiffs (a large number of G4S employees, who were employed by the U.S. Armed Forces in Korea at the time, was performing security services, etc. at each regional group of the U.S. Armed Forces.

) The entry application letter states that "I will agree to the entry of the defendant for the performance of the security office of US Armed Forces" and "I will make an employment contract after entry (after November 8, 2012)."

the United States Armed Forces was signed and submitted to the United States Armed Forces.

However, at the time, the security service contract of this case is appropriate.