beta
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The defendant is a person who purchased C apartment D (hereinafter "the apartment of this case"), and the plaintiff was an attorney-at-law belonging to E of the law firm.
B. The Defendant entered into a delegation contract with E law firm on the cancellation and cancellation of the apartment sale contract of this case, compensation for damages, return of unjust enrichment, etc. (hereinafter “instant delegation contract”) and the contents of the contract on the contingent remuneration, etc. are as follows.
Article 1 (Scope of Acceptance) (1) : He/she shall pay remunerations and costs of lawsuit to B (Law Firm E) in the so-called F case (Revocation and Termination of Sales Contract, Compensation for Damages, Return of Unjust Enrichment, etc.) (4) case: Article 3 (Remuneration) A (Defendant) of the entire litigation and preservation litigation in the first instance trial of the above case shall be paid to B (Law Firm E) as follows:
(2) contingent fees
1. 6% (including surtax; hereinafter the same shall apply) of "the difference between the market price and the appraised price of an apartment at the apartment sale price" when accepting a claim for cancellation or cancellation of a contract;
2.The amount calculated at the following rates by applying differential rates to the value of economic benefits when accepting a claim for damages or a claim for reduction of the sale price - The value of economic benefits - the value of 7% more than 5% but not more than 10%: 8% of the sale price - the value of economic benefits 9% more than 10% but not more than 15% of the sale price: 10% of the sale price - the value of economic benefits 15% more:
3. Time of payment: When money is received.
C. 1) The Plaintiff, as an attorney in charge of law firm E, is the Plaintiff Company G (hereinafter “G”) on behalf of the buyers of the instant apartment units including the Defendant.
2) On the part of the Incheon District Court H, etc. (hereinafter “instant lawsuit”).
The amount corresponding to the defendant 29,976,00 won and above, out of the amount equivalent to 12% of each purchase price to each of the plaintiffs by raising Eul from the above court on February 1, 2013.