1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The defendant is a person who purchased C apartment D (hereinafter "the apartment of this case"), and the plaintiff was an attorney-at-law belonging to E of the law firm.

B. The indication of the case under Article 1 (Scope of Acceptance of Contract) (1): the so-called F case (such as cancellation and termination of the sale contract, compensation for damages, and claim for restitution of unjust enrichment), scope of acceptance: Article 3 (Remuneration) A (Defendant) of the entire litigation and preservation litigation in the first instance trial of the above case shall pay remuneration and litigation costs to Eul (Law Firm E) as follows:

(2) contingent fees

1. 6% (including surtax; hereinafter the same shall apply) of "the difference between the market price and the appraised price of an apartment at the apartment sale price" when accepting a claim for cancellation or cancellation of a contract;

2.The amount calculated at the following rates by applying differential rates to the value of economic benefits when accepting a claim for damages or a claim for reduction of the sale price - The value of economic benefits - the value of 7% more than 5% but not more than 10%: 8% of the sale price - the value of economic benefits 9% more than 10% but not more than 15% of the sale price: 10% of the sale price - the value of economic benefits 15% more:

3. Payment time: On May 25, 2012, at the time of receipt of money, the Defendant and the law firm E entered into a delegation contract with respect to the cancellation or cancellation of the apartment sale contract in the instant case, compensation for damages, return of unjust enrichment, etc. (hereinafter “instant delegation contract”), and the contents of the agreement on contingent remuneration, etc. are as follows.

C. 1) The Plaintiff, as an attorney in charge of law firm E, is the Plaintiff Company G (hereinafter “G”) on behalf of the buyers of the instant apartment units including the Defendant.

2) On the part of the Incheon District Court H, etc. (hereinafter “instant lawsuit”).

“G and I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “I”) upon the preliminary claim from the said court on February 1, 2013 by raising B, shall be the amount equivalent to 12% of each purchase price to each of the plaintiffs.