logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.11.28 2013고단367
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Criminal facts

around January 26, 2013, the Defendant, “2013 Man-Ma367,” as an employee of “Eel” operated by the victim D, delegated the right to receive fees from the said employee, and stored for the victim at the charge from the customer on February 2, 2013, the Defendant voluntarily consumed the amount equivalent to KRW 2,000,000 in cash in the said Maurter on the part of 8:10 on February 2, 2013.

Accordingly, the Defendant embezzled another’s property.

"2013 Highest 539"

1. Fraud;

A. The Defendant, around 17:00 on December 18, 2012, at the HMoel operated by the victim G in Ansan-si, Seoul-si, a member G, that was operated by the victim G, the Defendant said that “the computer in the telecom has broken off the same time,” and the restoration system is not linked to the victim’s “the computer in the telecom,” and that the Defendant would repair the computer in the entire telecom, because the cost of parts and the cost of repair was performed in the computer system.

However, the fact did not have the intention or ability to repair the above computer because it purchased the parts.

The Defendant received 720,000 won from the victim in the name of computer parts, repair expenses, and transportation expenses.

B. On January 23, 2013, at around 9:00, the Defendant made a false statement to the Defendant that “The victim I, who had worked together as an employee at the her mother in an unsound place, called “the purchase of 2 mobile phones of the observer 2 mobile phone”, saying, “The victim would purchase 350,000 won a mobile phone which he would purchase 350,000 won a mobile phone.”

However, there was no intention or ability to purchase the above two mobile phones.

The defendant received 350,000 won from the victim as the purchase price for mobile phones at around 9:30 on the same day from the victim to the passbook in the name of the defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victims and received property twice.

2. The Defendant violating the Military Service Act is called up as public interest service personnel on September 3, 2012, and is members of Ansan-si.

arrow