logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2015.04.17 2015고단38
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for defendant B and for six months, respectively.

provided that this ruling has become final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A On December 12, 2014, the Cheongju District Court sentenced A to one year and two years of imprisonment for fraud, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 20, 2014.

1. The Defendants’ co-offenders Defendant A is an operator of I who is a food processing business establishment located in H in Chungcheongnam-si, and Defendant B is the representative director of J (hereinafter “J”) for the purpose of manufacturing and equipment of food factory automation machinery, and Defendant C is the business director of K (hereinafter “K”) for the purpose of manufacturing and selling food packaging machinery.

The support project for manufacturing and processing agricultural products in 2014 was designed to secure agricultural competitiveness, such as the local economy and the increase of farmers' income, and the subsidy of 70% (50% and 20%) out of the total project cost, to the agricultural product supply and processing enterprise selected as the subsidized project operator in Chungcheong City.

In order to be selected as a subsidized project operator, 30% of the total project cost shall be proved to be able to bear 30% of the total project cost, and in order for the subsidized project operator to actually receive the subsidy after the completion of the project, the part of the subsidy shall

Defendant

A and Defendant B entered into a contract for machinery and equipment with Defendant A selected as a subsidized business operator of the agricultural product manufacturing and processing support project in 2014, and Defendant A would return KRW 70 million out of the amount to be borne by Defendant A and conspired to receive subsidies by excessively appropriating the cost of supply.

Therefore, the Defendants received 70 million won out of the self-paid charges from A, and transferred it to the Credit Union account under the name of the L and returned. The Defendants paid the full amount of the self-paid charges to J and first executed, stating the deposit certificate, the copy of the passbook and the supply value of KRW 146,750,00 as if they were first executed.

arrow