Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for eight months, for Defendant C and D, for six months, and for Defendant E.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the actual representative of the J Agricultural Partnership (hereinafter referred to as the “J Agricultural Partnership”) for the purpose of producing traditional food in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, and Defendant B is the actual representative of the “L Co., Ltd.” (hereinafter referred to as “L”) for the purpose of producing traditional food. Defendant B is the actual representative of the “PP Co., Ltd.” (hereinafter referred to as “PP”) in Cheongju-si, U.S., the substantial representative of which is the “N” for the purpose of producing traditional food products. Defendant C is the actual representative of the “PP Co., Ltd.” (hereinafter referred to as “N”) for the purpose of electrical construction, etc. in Cheongju-si, Chungcheongnam-si.

Agricultural product manufacturing and processing support projects are projects aimed at securing agricultural competitiveness, such as regional economy and increase of farmers' income, and in the 2012 'project to support the manufacturing and processing of agricultural products', J farming association was selected as a subsidized project operator of the 2012 'project to support the manufacturing and processing of agricultural products' and 70% of the total project cost (50% of national expenses and 20%

1. When concluding L’s contracts for new construction of factories with L, Defendant A conspired to include excessive construction cost, etc., to include excessive construction cost, etc. when concluding N’s contracts for new construction of a manufacturing plant with N, and to obtain subsidies by means of receiving a refund of an excessive amount of supply price by appropriating excessive amount of supply price when concluding contracts for new construction of a manufacturing plant with N, and concluding contracts for electric fire-fighting and communications construction with P E.

From the end of May 2012 to the end of June 2012, the Defendant: (a) provided that “P” actually inputs KRW 69,400,00,00 of construction cost; (b) provided false tax invoices, construction contract documents, construction cost specifications, etc.; and (c) provided that P actually inputs construction cost of KRW 192,830,00,00, while L and C actually inputs construction cost of KRW 192,830,00.