logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2017.02.03 2015가합595
대여금
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 213,750,000 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from December 19, 2015 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. 인정사실 순번 송금일시 송금액(단위 : 원) 1 2015. 8. 21. 3,000,000 2 2015. 8. 21. 3,000,000 3 2015. 8. 22. 3,000,000 4 2015. 8. 23. 3,000,000 5 2015. 8. 24. 3,000,000 6 2015. 8. 25. 5,000,000 7 2015. 9. 1. 5,000,000 8 2015. 9. 2. 5,000,000 9 2015. 9. 2. 5,000,000 10 2015. 9. 2. 5,000,000 11 2015. 9. 3. 5,000,000 12 2015. 9. 4. 5,000,000 13 2015. 9. 4. 5,000,000 14 2015. 9. 8. 5,000,000 15 2015. 9. 8. 5,000,000 16 2015. 9. 9. 5,000,000 17 2015. 9. 9. 5,000,000 18 2015. 9. 12. 5,000,000 19 2015. 9. 13. 3,000,000 20 2015. 9. 13. 5,000,000 21 2015. 9. 14. 5,000,000 22 2015. 9. 16. 5,000,000 23 2015. 9. 17. 5,000,000 24 2015. 9. 18. 6,000,000 25 2015. 9. 18. 2,000,000 26 2015. 9. 18. 2,000,000 27 2015. 9. 18. 5,000,000 28 2015. 9. 19. 5,000,000 29 2015. 9. 19. 5,000,000 30 2015. 9. 22. 6,000,000 31 2015. 9. 22. 4,000,000 32 2015. 9. 23. 4,500,000 33 2015. 9. 24. 3,500,000 34 2015. 10. 30. 5,000,000 35 2015. 10. 30. 5,000,000 36 2015. 11. 2. 5,000,000 37 2015. 11. 2. 5,000,000 38 2015. 11. 2. 10,000,000 39 2015. 11. 3. 10,000,000 40 2015. 11. 4. 10,000,000 41 2015. 11. 5. 15,000,000 42 2015. 11. 6. 4,750,000 합계 215,750,000

A. From August 21, 2015 to November 6, 2015, the Plaintiff lent the instant money to the Defendant without setting the due date for reimbursement, by means of remitting the sum of KRW 215,750,000 (hereinafter “the instant money”) to the post office account (Account Number C) in the Defendant’s name, as indicated in the following table:

B. The Plaintiff urged the Defendant to repay the instant money from November 2015, but the Defendant did not comply with the demand.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1, 2, and 3, result of verification of evidence No. 1 of this court's autopsy, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. As to the Plaintiff’s claim for the return of the instant loan, the Defendant: (a) requested the Plaintiff to lend money to him/her around August 2015; and (b) made the phone call to the Kaman Plaintiff; and (c) the Plaintiff did not have money.

arrow