logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.10.20 2015가단130003
양수금
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff KRW 122,448,865 and KRW 30,100,913 among the Plaintiff’s Intervenor.

Reasons

1. On July 18, 2016, when the Plaintiff’s judgment on the Plaintiff’s claim was pending in the instant lawsuit, transferred the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendant to the Intervenor succeeding to the instant lawsuit (the Defendant’s consent to withdrawal from the instant lawsuit is without agreement). Ultimately, the Plaintiff cannot be deemed to have a claim against the Defendant, and the Plaintiff’s claim is without merit.

2. Determination as to the plaintiff's successor's claim

A. The indication of the claim: It is as indicated in the reasons for the claim (However, the obligee’s “Plaintiff” as “Plaintiff”) and the Plaintiff’s successor’s claim against the Defendant as above was transferred on July 18, 2016 by the Plaintiff’s successor.

(b) Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow