1. As to the Plaintiff’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s 60,177,592 won and 21,832,950 won among them, the Defendant began on October 30, 2015.

1. During the course of the lawsuit of this case, the Plaintiff transferred his claim against the Defendant to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff’s claim is therefore groundless without the Defendant’s consent to withdrawal from the lawsuit of this case.

2. Determination as to the plaintiff's successor's claim

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(However, ‘creditor' is regarded as ‘Plaintiff' and ‘debtor' as ‘Defendant').

Article 208 (3) 3 of Civil Procedure Act)