The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is recognized as the defendant's intent of attacking the victim's body with the intent to suppress the victim by setting up against the victim D's assault and causing bodily injury. Thus, the court below's decision that acquitted the defendant by applying self-defense and misunderstanding of facts is erroneous.

2. The summary of the facts charged was around 22:00 on March 10, 2008, the Defendant got the victim to be save from the victim in front of the mutual influorial head of the company located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Incheon, and the Defendant asserted that the Defendant was saved with the victim while fighting the body of the victim and exceeded the floor with the body of the victim, thereby resulting in the Defendant’s right saves and saves that require approximately 6 weeks of treatment.

3. In full view of the witness D and E’s written statement, the police interrogation protocol of the defendant against the defendant, etc. under the influence of alcohol, the victim took the above heading house and E, who is a workplace partner, without any justifiable reason. The defendant's face at one time due to the victim's own drinking, who was asked "Isson," and the defendant was able to take the defendant's face at one time due to the defendant's continuous drinking, and use the defendant's face and body in the floor when Isn't kn't kn't kn't kn's face and body, and then it can be acknowledged that the defendant's face and body was kn't kn't kn't kn't with the victim's body against it. Thus, the victim's act of unilaterally setting the defendant's body and kn's act constitutes considerable infringement of the defendant's life and body, and thus, it does not constitute self-defense under the former part of Article 21 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

4. The records of the decision of the court.