Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A on November 6, 2014, who was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment for six months for fraud at the Suwon Franchisium, and was sentenced to the suspension of the execution on November 14 of the same year, which became final and conclusive on November 14 of the same year.

Since around 2010, the Defendants conspired to use money by deceiving victims E who come to know as a real estate broker due to lack of occupation while living together with others.

around July 2013, the Defendants met the victims at the Seoul real estate office located in the Seoul real estate office where the victims work in the Seoul Special Self-Governing City F before North Korea, and the Defendant A punished the victims with money for a long time during the auction.

B. If the investment is trusted and made, it is intended to offer money by means of auction.

Defendant B is the father of the victim, and Defendant B is the father of the victim, and Defendant B is the father of the victim, and Defendant B may pay a lot of money to the victim with the trust and investment of his/her husband and wife in the auction.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendants only intended to receive money from the injured party for personal purposes, such as repayment of debt and living expenses, and they did not have any intent or ability to make the injured party invest in the auction of the money received from the injured party or to have the injured party pay the money.

Nevertheless, the Defendants are in the same manner victims of damage.

8. Around 23. Around July 17, 2015, a sum of KRW 175,000,000 was received from around 23 to around 6 million in the NongHyup account in Defendant B’s name, as indicated in the list of crimes in attached Form 14 times.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to attract the victim to receive the goods.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendants' respective legal statements in the first, second, and third public trial records;

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. Statement protocol by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on transaction details by financial institutions;

1. The Defendants of the relevant legal provisions regarding criminal facts: Articles 347(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively.

1. Defendant B of the suspended execution: