Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of three years and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year and eight months.

Defendant

A. A.

Punishment of the crime

"2018 Highest 1899"

1. Joint crimes committed by the Defendants

A. From January 2017, the Defendants violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) puts comments on, or “recommendation” or “Good faith” on, the Internet SNS promotion articles of an enterprise using Nowon-gu and smartphones.

The “Internet SNS Promotion Project” that advertises the above company in the manner of charactering “the victim C(23) who has employed a victim C(3) who has reported and contacted with the above company employees on the Internet job-seeking job site by advertising the above company, and had drawn up the victim to the above business, and had the victim deducted money from the victim for the purpose of investing in the business fund. On April of the same year, the victim may be punished at KRW 20 million per day, and at least KRW 30,000 per day, the victim may be punished at KRW 10,000 per day, and at that time, at least KRW 40,000.

There is no way to punish this money at the fourth age.

D. The phrase “as it is better for others to obtain offices, such as .......”, and the phrase “to purchase office equipment and computers, etc. to obtain offices, and to use four credit cards, for a long time, and to use four credit cards,” is the same from the person who consented to such purchase.

4. The loan of KRW 6,00,000 on the credit card of around 20.20 and the lease of office units in Daegu-gu E-Ba F, Daegu-gu, E-Ba, and the purchase of office units, including computers, for the same year.

5.1. He had the victim get additional loans of KRW 2,00,000 on the D Card Co., Ltd. and used them in entirety.

Then, the Defendants are in the same year.

5. Around 18.00: (a) around 01:00, the victim demanded that the victim lend money to the victim’s family members under the business name of KRW 10,000,000 as business funds; (b) however, the victim was asked to refuse the above demand from the victim who thought that the victim would have been able to demand money continuously and continuously, as long as it is irrelevant to the business.