(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.01.23 2013고단803

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.01.23 2013고단803

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등

Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

except that from the date of this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 02:00 on October 16, 201, Defendant A told the victim H (the age of 22) to “Ne-gu I (name B after the opening)” at G main points located in Gumisi F on the ground that the victim H (the age of 22) was “Ne-gu I (the name B after the opening) is the same as the victim’s face.”

In this respect, the victim carried dangerous objects and put about about two weeks of treatment.

2. Defendant A, B, and C conspired to assault the victim on the ground that the victim H expressed his desire to commit the Defendant B, as described in paragraph (1).

On October 28, 2011, at around 03:30 on October 28, 201, the Defendants set up a door at the residence of the victim H and K (22 years old) located in the Si/Gu-Si J building 204, but the victims did not open the door, Defendant B invaded into the house through the studio gas pipe, and Defendant A and C invaded into the studio against the will of the victim H and K through the entrance opened by K.

The prosecutor "the defendant B opened the entrance, and the defendant A and C intruded into the studio through the open opening entrance," as examined in the second paragraph (a) of the judgment of the following defendants and the defense counsel, although he was indicted, he was found to have opened the entrance to the defendant A and C, he was also guilty of infringing on the peace of privacy against the resident H and K's will. Since the defendants examined the defendant as a witness while disputing this part, it is recognized that there is no concern that there might be any substantial disadvantage to the defendant's exercise of his defense right, and therefore, the criminal facts as above are recognized without modification of the indictment.

In this studio, Defendant B expressed h’s desire to do so, but there is only one time to reduce the death of Defendant B’s gueste.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 2015.08.11 2015고단2487

-대전지방법원 서산지원 2012.08.10 2011고단1150

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.12.06 2013고단3051

-창원지방법원 진주지원 2015.10.15 2015고합63

-창원지방법원 2015.08.12 2015노1184