Defendant

A Imprisonment of one year and six months, Defendant B’s imprisonment of one year and two months, Defendant C’s imprisonment of one year and one year and six months, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highest 2114] Defendant A, B, C, and D’s status and role, public offering relation, Defendant A, and Defendant B obtained false career certificates, etc. from a large number of persons, thereby unfairly issuing a construction engineer’s career certificate under the name of a large number of persons, and arranging lending to a construction company.

Defendant

C From January 1, 2008 to November 19, 2015, the Korea Construction Technology Association had been in charge of the receipt and issuance of reports on career certificates of construction technicians while serving in the Jeonju Branch and Gwangju Branch.

Defendant

D is a professor of V University located in the Republic of Korea in the Republic of Korea (former name: W University prior to the change).

Qualifications for elementary level technology among the qualifications for construction technicians issued by the Korea Construction Engineers Association (hereinafter referred to as the "Association") shall be granted to a person who has completed a curriculum related to construction technology for at least one year at an educational institution publicly notified by the Minister of Construction and Transportation in accordance with the Construction Technology Promotion Act and has completed a construction work for at least seven years.

Defendant

A and B recruited those who wish to obtain the first class engineer qualification in the field of civil engineering and had them registered with V University due to the lack of school affairs management due to the government's selection of university to limit the government's financial support.

Defendant

D은 피고인 A과 공모하여 위와 같이 모집된 사람들이 수업에 전혀 출석하지 않더라도 정상적으로 V 대학교 토목 조경 학부 1년 과정을 이수한 것처럼 꾸몄다.

Defendant

A introduced students to Defendant D in order to comply with the conditions of completion of the curriculum necessary for the construction engineer experience report, and Defendant D, even if the students registered with Defendant A as the introduction, did not attend the curriculum, issued a certificate as if he completed the normal course of one-year course of the V University Civil Engineering Flag.

It can be recognized that there was a public contest between the defendant A and D.

Unlike the above, Defendant D’s public invitation relation, namely, Defendant A, B, and C, as stated in the indictment.