beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal records] On May 3, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the Youngcheon District Court’s Young-gu branch’s Young-gu branch on September 28, 2017, and completed the execution of the sentence. On January 16, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud in the same court on July 16, 2018 and completed the execution of the sentence.
[2] On March 22, 2002, the Defendant was sentenced to four years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and Protection, etc. of Victims Thereof (Rape, etc. of Minors under the age of 13) in the early branch of the Chuncheon District Court on February 13, 2006, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Ansan Prison on June 23, 2006. On April 27, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for the same crime from the astronomical branch of the Daejeon District Court on April 27, 2009, and the execution of the sentence was completed at the Seocheon Prison Branch on September 2, 2013.
A person with an electronic device installed shall not arbitrarily separate or damage the electronic device from his/her body during the period of attachment of the electronic device, interfere with its propagation, alter data received, or otherwise impair its utility.
Nevertheless, on July 16, 2018, the Defendant received an order to charge the location tracking electronic device from the protection observation officer in front of the “C” located in Thai City B on the street in Thai City on July 23:42, 2018. However, even if the Defendant received an order to charge the location tracking electronic device, “balm bank would be galm bank?” and “I am galm bank would see it on the roadside floor so that it can not trace the Defendant’s location by arbitrarily separating the above electronic device attached to the Defendant’s body from the Defendant’s body on the floor, and leaving the site as it is.
As a result, the defendant has harmed the utility by arbitrarily separating the electronic device from his body during the period of attachment of the electronic device.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each 112 Reporting List 1.2