A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 1, 2016, the Defendant attempted to larceny at night buildings and did not commit an attempted crime by entering the said church into the said church in front of the “E church” operated by the victim D located in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, an Ansan-si, and following the unconstitutionality of the money and valuables. However, the Defendant did not commit an attempted crime even with the wind that is not unconstitutional.

2. Larceny of intrusion on night buildings;

A. On February 2, 2016, around 02:00, the Defendant entered the above office through open windows in front of the “H” office for the operation of the Victim G located in Ansan-si, Masan-si, Masan-si, and then stolen cash worth KRW 40,000,000, owned by the victim and subsequently was stolen.

B. On February 3, 2016, around 02:00, the Defendant entered the said office through open windows before the said office, and then stolen 30,000 won in cash owned by the victim in the book.

(c)

On February 10, 2016, at around 06:45, the Defendant entered the above office through open windows before “H” office, and stolen the Defendant, with one head of the Tong owned by the victim and one head of the Tong owned by the victim in the book.

(d)

On February 13, 2016, at around 06:57, the Defendant entered the above office through open windows before “H” office, and stolen the Defendant with one head of the agricultural Tong owned by the victim and one head of the Tong owned by the victim in the book.

3. Intrusion upon a structure and theft;

A. On February 9, 2016, around 08:25, the Defendant entered the above office through open windows before the above “H” office. On the same date, the Defendant notified the Defendant of the rejection of the prosecution on the same day on May 13, 2016 (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 88Do67, Mar. 22, 198) in an amendment to indictment to the effect that the public prosecutor’s revocation of the prosecution was revoked (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 88Do67, Mar. 22, 198)

B. On February 9, 2016, the Defendant entered the above “H” office in front of the above office on February 10:15, 2016, and intruded into the above office through open windows, and is on the book.