logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.08.12 2015고단4791
사기
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person operating NGO’s “F” for the purpose of international emergency relief and regional development in the United States.

The defendant knew that (the state) members of the Victim G, which was established for the purpose of overseas relief activities, etc., receive a large quantity of brand clothing inventory products from enterprises, such as No.S., on condition that they will contribute them to overseas, and disposed of them in the Republic of Korea, and tried to use the proceeds thereof.

The defendant around December 7, 2013, at the office of G, an incorporated association located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, transferred the clothing donated to the injured party to the executive secretary I in charge of providing overseas goods of the said incorporated association to the executive secretary I, who is in charge of providing goods overseas by the injured party, carried out the clothing in the Jeju-do and distributed it in kind to the injured party overseas.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the defendant had no intention or ability to donate to the overseas relief area even if he received a letter from the injured party, because the defendant received the letter and planned to distribute it in Korea and to use it individually.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the above I, received 6,724 points, such as the examination clothes and diskettes in an amount of KRW 832,960,00 (Disposition Price of KRW 59 million) from the above I, and acquired it by fraud.

2. As evidence directly corresponding to the facts charged in the market, “The defendant obtained prior permission and sold the clothes, and all sales proceeds were paid to the defendant.

In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated in this Court, the evidence presented by the prosecutor, including the above statement, is recognized to acknowledge that the Defendant was subjected to the category of Melel by deceiving the Defendant from the beginning with a plan to distribute the clothes in Korea and to use them individually, with the plan to use them individually.

arrow