logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2014.07.07 2014고단132
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment of two years and six months at the Seoul Eastern District Court on August 17, 2012 for a violation of the Public Official Election Act, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 16, 2013, and is still in a female prison as of January 16, 2013.

"2014 Highest 132"

1. Defendant A

A. A. On July 22, 2009, the Defendant: (a) around early July 22, 2009, 2009, the Defendant got a victim E, who was introduced through the Defendant’s branch of the Defendant, to the Defendant, as if the Defendant secured the Defendant’s right to operate a boom restaurant in the F apartment construction site in Sungnam-nam City; and (b) was willing to receive money as the cost of delivery and to use it

Accordingly, on July 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “If the Defendant paid KRW 30 million to the victim, he may transfer the right to operate a brine restaurant within the head of the Sungnam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City F apartment construction work site ordered by LH, which is ordered by LH,” and through B, the Defendant was able to follow the victim’s right to operate the brine restaurant at the construction site of the F apartment site in Sungnam-nam Special Metropolitan City, by making efforts to the executives of LH and without the molding so that the Defendant may pay KRW 30 million to the Defendant’s account.”

However, at the time, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to transfer the right to operate the restaurant to the victim, even if he received the said money, he did not have any intention or ability to transfer the right to operate the restaurant to the victim, even if he did not have obtained the right to operate the restaurant or received the said money.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 30 million won from the victim the transfer price of the right to operate the restaurant from the national bank passbook (I) in the name of the Defendant on July 22, 2009.

B. Around May 13, 2011, the fraud Defendant: (a) around May 13, 201, the victim E is also required to meet and pay money to the victim E in French; and (b) if the Defendant lends five million won to the victim E in connection with the operation of the restaurant, the money shall be paid within one week.

arrow