The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor of fact-finding, even though the defendant could sufficiently recognize that he had committed an act of inserting his sexual organ into the written resistance of D, a child juvenile twice, the court below acquitted all of the facts charged, which is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing is too uneasible.

2. Determination

A. On June 19, 2017, the summary of this part of the facts charged is as follows: (a) although the Defendant was aware of D (18 years old) who sought to work as an entertainment receptionist in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu I and 6’s “H” on June 19, 2017, in the course of talking with D as a minor, he/she would be employed as an entertainment receptionist; and (b) and “in order to perform any work, he/she must do so.”

The phrase "I am on the side of the customer, I am close, I am close," and I am to "Kel" located in the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan CityJ.

On June 19, 2017, the Defendant: (a) stated that “I wish to perform any work, I must do so to my own; (b) I want to go back,” and (c) added D to D, against which I resist, while putting D, against which I resist, into the following:

"At all times, she is off," and "at least, she is pregnant, she shall be off."

D’s refusal, i.e., “E., f., e., f., f., e., f., e., f., e., f., f., e., f., d., e., e., f., d

Since then, the Defendant: (a) tried to send DD to a entertainment shop while moving into G K5 car; and (b) tried to send D to a entertainment shop; (c) however, the business establishment decided that D would refuse to employ D; (d) on June 20, 2017, the Defendant called D to the “Lel” to the nearby “Lel”; and (d) on the basis that D would go into a good horse; and (e) did not so at any time when entering the telecom.