The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor to the gist of the grounds for appeal, even though the defendant and the requester for an attachment order (hereinafter the defendant) conspired to commit rapes with the juvenile I, the court below acquitted the defendant of all of the facts charged of this case. The court below erred by misapprehending the rules of evidence or misunderstanding of facts.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case 1) Defendant A (one-person J) is the manager of the amusement shop "L" located in K in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and Defendant B (one-person M) is the manager of the amusement shop "O" located in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City N.

On June 20, 2017, from around 05:00 to 08:00 on the same day, the Defendants were unable to identify the heading room of “G” located on the first floor of the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City FF underground, with the view to: (a) doing so while failing to comply with the level of alcohol, I judged that I were a minor for entertainment entertainment, and that I were forced to drink I and forced I to drink I.

At around 08:10 on the same day, the Defendants reported that I had no mind of being under the influence of alcohol with I while giving money to I, and thought that I would engage in rape, and induce I to answer to I as if I agreed to engage in sexual traffic, and then I will make I enter I to enter it, and even though I am "I will not come to go to the sexual flag of Defendant B", I am to get I to go to go to the sexual flag of Defendant B by hand, while I am to go to go to her in spite of "I would not come to go to go to the sexual organ of Defendant B". Defendant A, by hand, caused I to go to come to the sexual organ of Defendant B by having I kn's head bonds.

Since then, the Defendants are in the protection of I.