1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Relationship between the parties] The representative director is the victim in the facts charged of the victim G corporation.

However, the subject of execution of I is not an individual representative director, and the obstruction of the Defendants' business is all interference with the company's business.

The complainant of this case is also a company that is not a J individual.

As above, even if the victim is recognized as a non-individual company, there is no obstacle to the defendants' exercise of right to defense, so the victim was changed ex officio.

Since July 21, 2017, I started work from H and seven parcels of public housing, and I started work.

The Defendants opposed to the Corporation on the ground that the residents’ roads living at the H construction site and the H residents did not have sufficient compensation even though they harm the beauty of the village and harm the natural environment due to the construction work, and constituted “I-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U.

[Criminal facts]

1. Defendant B, around August 21, 2017, found that the instant construction site was a tree brue, and found the brue, and Defendant B, at the site of construction for about one hour, performed a construction work to K at the site of construction.

(2) whether or not the construction has been made.

In addition, it interfered with the victim's duties concerning the establishment of the victim's I by force, such as making the brue of the brush, the brue of the brue, the equipment at the construction site of a wooden brue, preventing the brue from doing documentary work at the construction site, and obstructing the victim's duties by force during the same period from around the above time to February 24 of the same month.

2. On September 12, 2017, the Defendant’s sole crime committed by Defendant C was found to have driven the Defendant’s rocketing cars at the construction site above around 08:00, and, at the construction site, was installed with the parking of the shots and shots in front of the shots and shots while working at the construction site for about 40 minutes and took a bath for those who are under construction at the construction site.